I have studied data science and they have to specify a standard that can be communicated." Hell it beats Detroit Become Human for the love of God. So if I was out in the market for a game, and I would go on to buy one based on reviews and score, I would find Hollow Knight amongst master-pieces like Red Dead Redemption 2, BOTW, WOW, Half-life 2, forza horizon, uncharted, God of War and in my mind I would have to consider getting Hollow Knight amongst those master-pieces, it's like comparing a Toyota Yaris to a Ferrari, because people believe that HK is a 9/10. It's a hard 6/10 as a platformer, but people like it and based on defiantly not measurable or comparable data, they gave it a score. So, where exactly does this games, even if categorized, is a 9/10. Imagine comparing it to the likes of Cyberpunk, The Matrix Demo, Forza Horizon 5. HK and it's graphics: yeah that is out of the question. HK as software, with its functionality and mechanics: It is not COD, Spiderman, WOW etc etc etc.
HK as art: not that impressive, the artstyle looks lacking at best. it's just not as fun as playing most of the games from above and not as difficult as a hard-core metroidvenia can be. Lastly let's talk about the fun factor, which is limited to single player unlike lbp, Rayman, it takes two and others. As for the combat, it is not as fluid as dead cells, not as liquid as Rayman, not as advanced as many mentioned above. The movement can not be compared with the likes of Assassins Creed or lets say bloodstained: ritual of the night or maybe even crash bandicoot 4 or super meat boy and the art-style and atmosphere lack heavily towards the likes of Ori, Rayman Legends, little big planet, spyro etc. HK as a platformer: cannot be compared to the likes of Mario Odyssey, Mirror's Edge or Zelda BOTW (which can be categorized as a 3d platformer). Hollow Knight for instance, has a score of 90, let's analyze: I have studied data science and they have to specify a standard that can be communicated.Īnd what you are saying is NOT true, let me explain. featuring a pseudo-3d 2d-movement effect and simple puzzles 🤣🤣🤣 the literal god of 3d AAA platformers.īut it's no much for FEZ - a strong 90 on metacritic, released some years later. bashed for being too generic and sterile.Īnd yet Mirror's Edge 2009 - a 79 on metacritic. Mirror's Edge Catalyst - a 69 on metacritic. it's a souls like 2D platformer, with limited movement - almost no story and repetitive gameplay. Mad Max - a 73 on metacritic, a masterpiece of open-world game design and aesthetic. it's a draw within the lines with a brush game. You can't pit low-budget indie games with AAA multi-million dollar budgets and movie-like experiences, together, and then give the jump-jump-shoot 2d platformer a 95 because it is good at jumping and bomb the 200-dev AA - AAA game because it wasn't in the level of God of war or Grand Theft Auto, WHILE THEY ARE RANKED IN THE SAME SYSTEM.Ĭhicory: A Colorful Tale - a 90 on metacritic, with a lot of reviewers giving it 100. They should seriously start rating games based on categories. ActualEngineer 262d ago (Edited 262d ago )
0 kommentar(er)
